Daddy, Why Do the Two Parties Hate Each Other So Much? They Don’t Son. It’s Just We Are All Things Good, and They Are the Spawn of Satan!

I know who would get my vote…..image from dailykos.com

Editorial note: I’ve had some personal difficulties, so this post has been delayed. My apologies for that. So I won’t edit (much), but know that I started the post having a good day, and will be finishing the post….well….time will tell….

Second Editorial note: I have had to do quite a bit of work on this one. I started out thinking I would simply do a quick post, but the more I dig into it, the more I feel needs to be shared. So, this is not from the day after, but I won’t edit out the time frame, since I want ya’ll to get the feel of a tired man trying to think all this through.

Yesterday (love was such an easy game to play….) I posted what I learned about the history of school shootings in the US. I’ll leave the link below in case you wish to read it or reread it:

https://wordpress.com/post/tiredmidnightblogger.wordpress.com/1820

I’m going to write an entire post about the third point I said I would discuss: The apparent Second Amendment/gun control arguments are a red herring of the most despicable order. (Hey! I wrote that!) Editorial note: honestly this will likely end up being a three post topic.

I want to establish two points quickly. The two sides of the debate have valid principles at the foundation of their debate. Just like abortion, you have two strong principles at loggerheads, but people essentially jump up and down about the one they side with, but refuse to acknowledge the truth upon which the opposition stands. Second Amendment people wish to have the right to bear arms because they deeply (and I think rightly) believe that guns are often necessary to protect against the evils of tyrants, robbers, rapists, the worst of the worst. Gun control advocates have an equally strong desire to protect life, they wish to curtail the foolish misuse of guns that has demonstrably taken so many lives. I want to start with this because I want to do the opposite of what the sleaze ball politicians are doing. I want to actually respect your position. I want to let you know that someone, at least, is actually listening. And I learned from The Seven Habits of Highly People that people don’t really care what what you know, till they know you care.

In my mind this is the best self help you can read. I know it’s off topic, but these principles would so help our world right now.

Getting back on topic, polarization is simply the result of our two party system, and it is hard to know which one to start with. I’ll flip a coin and pick a party, and then I’ll run for the goal line. Let’s see how quickly I get tackled.

We’ll start with the Democrats. “Heads it is.” Editorial note: this coin flip turned out to be exactly where I needed to start after all.

First of all, the Democrats built up their once awesome power base, in part, off of gun control. Old habits die hard.

I have to be honest, before I started writing this post, I had no idea how the Democrats came to be the party of gun control. They have been all of my adult life, and I frankly just went with it. It was a fact of and force of nature, like gravity, sunlight, and surface tension on water. Republicans are pro gun anti life, (except with abortion, but we’ll worry about that brain twister some other day….if ever), and Democrats were pro gun control anti liberty. I honestly never thought to ask, till recently, how we got here.

I know I was talking about the Democrats, but I promise this is actually relevant. It all started with Al Capone, who was played by Al Pacino in Scarface. I’ve never watched the movie, but some of the quotes have become a part of our culture. This quote is one of my favorites. You can say whatever else you want about ol’ Alphonse, he had his priorities right. Image from memegenerator.net

Cliff’s notes version: Al Capone was one of (some would say the most) the most notorious gangsters of the Prohibition era, back in the day when it was spelled with an “r.” (I hate these word crimes). Gangsters had started to shoot up society with their Tommy Guns (yet there were profoundly fewer school shootings back then…..) and the government felt the heat to hammer down the law. At the time, the Democrats were in profound control. FDR was large and in charge, and would be for the next thirteen years, the only President in history to serve more than two terms. The Dems also held the reigns in Congress and the Senate: in the House, 322 seats were Democrat, 103 were Republican. In the Senate it was 60 to 35. The Supreme Court was the only impediment to the Democrats holding virtually absolute power at the time-there were five Republicans and four Democrats.

For all intents and purposes, it could be argued the Democratic party was the government in the late thirties. The common man was living large in the fifties, and even into the sixties, and the Democrats received a lot of credit for that. But part of their power block had been built on laws controlling the guns of Mafioso, and later, in the sixties, when JFK, MLK, and Bobby Kennedy were assassinated, the party continued to be the party of strong gun control. The Democrats, and frankly, even Republicans felt that the laws being passed were reasonable. This changed in the late sixties. This was the time when the debate became super charged.

This is where the polarization began. But I post this pic for two reasons: 1) the polarization is like a Bipolar lover, the switch may flip to the other side any time. And 2) in case you think I fawn too much over Reagan, I absolutely know he did some things that make even his fans question what he was thinking. 3) It can be hard sometimes to tell who the heroes and who the villains were in history. Be careful who you pick as your hero, you never really know what dark shadows lie in the corner.

2. The Republican Party got so used to not being the party in power, they became the reactionary party.

As you can see from the above statistics, the Republican party had their keisters handed to them during the forties. All too often, people who find themselves on the losing side can become desperate. As an example from history, at the end of both WWI and WWII, the Germans started sending the elderly and lads scarcely more than children out on the battlefield, anyone and everything they could throw at us, with the futile hope that if they could slow us down some miracle would turn the tide.

The Volkssturm were conscripted men between the ages of 16 and 60 who had not before been drafted to fight in the war. Hitler was getting desperate, the losses had been horrific, and with resources on the wain, Germany had to turn to the boys and the elderly. The effort was doomed. Image from Wikipedia.

According to Vox.com, the best and frankly most effective reactionary Republican was no other than J. Edgar Hoover. While he was a Republican in affiliation, J. Edgar’s main loyalty was to himself. Some would argue that is unfair, and that his chief loyalty was to America, which may be true, though some suspect his vision of America was a bit fractured. Most of his efforts to affect elections seemed somewhat centrist (though to most modern minds, meddling with elections at all was intensely unethical), and frankly his most notorious spying during the Roosevelt administration was against fellow Republican Sen. Gerald P. Nye of North Dakota. He became furious with Democrat President Truman because he created the CIA, which he saw as a rival to his precious FBI. Hoover ordered the release of awkward information about Truman’s association with Kansas City political graft boss Tom Pendergast. David McCullough in his epic biography Truman writes about that association, and the challenging campaign Truman ran against the odds to be reelected. In the biggest surprise election from that time till the election of Trump, Truman proved the experts wrong and won another four years as President.

One of the most iconic photos of all time, Truman in triumph holds up a newspaper, printed during early vote counts proclaiming Republican Dewey the winner. One of the most embarrassing failures of journalism (and maybe the last major embarrassment where mainstream news media actually favored a Republican presidential candidate over a Democrat), this election prompted major shifts in how elections were covered, and how political projections were managed by the news for the next sixty plus years.

We move on to the fifties, when Senator McCarthy made a splash with his anti communist tirades. In February of 1950 he became famous with a speech he made claiming he had a list of 205 Communists working in the State Department. He began a witch hunt that in the short run made him very powerful, but led to his disgrace and downfall, and has been a black eye in the Republican party ever since.

This is….not Joseph McCarthy. This is the fictional character Senator Iselin from the iconic movie The Manchurian Candidate. In the movie he claims there are “57 card carrying communists in the Defense Department.” The similarity to the real McCarthy is noteworthy. If you love older movies with a dark conspiracy theory twist, this is a great one to watch.

As the sixties progressed, the assassinations of prominent Democrats, along with violent riots and protests, caused the Democrats to crack down even further (and frankly, also Republicans, but the blame often tends to fall on the party in power). By 1968 American people on both sides of the aisle had grown disenchanted with the government. The hippy movement, the civil rights movement, and the liberal left attempted to take over the national convention. Frankly….I was going to gloss over this, but these things happened scant years before I was born. I’d heard rumors, vague references to the riots of hippies who tried to take over the Democratic convention. Then I started reading the Wikipedia article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1968_Democratic_National_Convention

From the article:

[President] Johnson had wanted the Democratic convention to be held in Houston, but [Chicago mayor] Daley had successfully lobbied the president to have the convention held in Chicago, as he wanted the convention held in his city to showcase to the national media how successful he had been since he started serving as mayor in 1955.[17] Daley, a man who ruled Chicago in an extremely authoritarian style, felt very strongly that the protesters were going to ruin what was supposed to be his moment of triumph and was determined to stop them.[17] One of Daley’s aides told the media that the anti-war demonstrators were “revolutionaries bent on the destruction of America”.[18] The mayor attempted to impose restrictions to keep protesters as far away as possible from the convention, on their numbers, and on their activities, making it very clear that he much preferred that no protesters come to his city.[19] Two of the SDS [student democratic protesters] leaders, Tom Hayden and Rennie Davis, had planned to keep their protests peaceful, but the lack of permits for protesting together with thinly veiled threats that the Chicago police would beat demonstrators made it clear that there would probably be violence.[16] When the media reported that Daley had given orders to the police to restrict the activities of Democratic delegates loyal to McCarthy, Daley was enraged, giving a rambling press conference saying, “This is a vicious attack on this city and its mayor”.[20]

The leaders of the Yippies (an acronym for Youth International Party), Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin, specialized in outlandish, bizarre rhetoric that attracted maximum media attention, and Daley took many of their more outrageous threats seriously.[21] To sabotage the convention, Hoffman and Rubin announced that they were sending “super-hot” hippie girls to seduce the delegates and give them LSD; that they were going to put LSD into the water supply of the International Amphitheatre; and were sending well-endowed hippie “studs” to seduce the wives and daughters of the delegates.[21] In a typical press release, Hoffman and Rubin stated about their plans in Chicago: “We are dirty, smelly, grimy and foul…we will piss and shit and fuck in public…we will be constantly stoned or tripping on every drug known to man”.[21] Daley took all of this seriously, and much of the excessive security was due to his belief that the Yippies were going to disrupt the convention in the manner that they had proclaimed they would.[21]

Daley’s heavy-handed security measures incensed the media. Walter Cronkite complained of “a totally unwarranted restriction of free and rapid access to information.”[20] Eric Sevareid stated that Chicago “runs the city of Prague a close second right now as the world’s least attractive tourist destination”.[20] Intelligence agents had infiltrated the protesters, including agents from the Central Intelligence Agency, who – contrary to American law – had been sent to spy upon Americans in the United States.[18] Just before the convention started, Hoffman and Rubin showed up at the Civic Center Plaza to free the pig named Pigasus whom they had nominated as the Democratic candidate, leading the police to seize Pigasus while arresting Rubin and five others.[16] The Pigasus incident was captured live on television. Over 10,000 people had arrived in Chicago to protest against the Vietnam War, and the city in late August was much on the edge.[18] The Chicago police raided the mostly black neighborhoods of South Chicago to stage mass arrests of the Blackstone Rangers, a black power group that was alleged to be planning to assassinate Humphrey.[22] 

Also:

The security measures imposed by Daley had been so intense that it was not possible to walk across the convention floor without jostling other delegates, which added to the tensions as dovish and hawkish Democrats fiercely argued about whether to accept Johnson’s war plank to the platform. All of it was captured live on national television.[34] Pro-war Democrats challenged the right of the economist John Kenneth Galbraith, who was serving as the floor manager for McCarthy, to be there and sought to have him expelled from the convention.[34] Inside the convention hall were televisions showing the police beating and clubbing demonstrators outside, which increased the tension.[34] Robert Maytag, the chairman of the Colorado delegation asked: “Is there any rule under which Mayor Daley can be compelled to suspend the police state terror being perpetrated at this minute on kids in front of the Conrad Hilton [hotel]?”[35] Daley’s face flushed with anger while his supporters began to boo Maytag.[35] On the convention floor, Senator Abraham Ribicoff rose to give a speech nominating McGovern as the Democratic candidate.[36] During his speech, Ribicoff pointed to Daley and said: “With George McGovern, we wouldn’t have Gestapo tactics on the streets of Chicago.”[36] Pandemonium broke out in the convention hall, with some delegates praising Ribicoff while others denounced him. Daley rose up to scream at the top of his voice at Ribicoff: “Fuck you, you Jew son of bitch! You lousy motherfucker! Go home!”[36] Despite Daley’s foul-mouthed antisemitic tirade, Ribicoff merely said: “How hard it is to accept the truth. How hard it is.”[36] Four Chicago city officials, known Daley loyalists, jumped on the stage to usher Ribicoff away, and Daley’s bodyguards surrounded him, though from what threat they protected him remained unclear.[35]

The convention was noteworthy for leading to a significant change in the rules governing delegate selection, largely overshadowed at the time by the rioting in Chicago.[37] The McGovern–Fraser Commission, chaired by Senator McGovern, officially known as the Commission on Party Structure and Delegate Selection, was appointed to examine how delegates were selected.[37] The commission documented that in many places in America the Democratic Party was “an autocratic, authoritarian organization” that engaged in the “shameful exploitation of the voter.”[37]

Nixon won that year, and the power hold the Democrats had had since FDR was at an end. I’m going to end on this note, I’m going to share some footage from the convention, and I hope all and sundry will compare this fiasco to January 6.

I’ll hopefully have more Friday.

The 99th Most Googled Question in the US? Why Are Flags At Half Mast Today? Memorial Day Post

Even Joey Tribbiani find’s this statistic shocking. Image….hell you know….Friends. From that website on the picture. Something like that.

Tomorrow is Memorial Day. Very much a bitter sweet holiday. It has become a three day weekend to mark the unofficial “official’ beginning of summer. Lots of grilling, going to the lake, consuming beer. And that is cool. But it has other meaning more somber.

When I blogged the first time, I made sure to write a special post for Memorial Day. I felt that the original meaning was getting lost in the shallow glut of commercialism that frankly surrounds nearly all of the holidays (at least, those still largely celebrated). Here it is….not real impressive, but at least it has survived intact, unlike most of my posts from that time:

https://noxforchristmas.wordpress.com/2012/05/23/ill-always-bring-you-roses/

Talk about a painful walk down memory lane….but the point I made then is still valid. Essentially….over a million people have sacrificed their lives that we might be free, and untold millions more have sacrificed family, sanity, fortunes….and it seems the best we can do to honor them is to grill hotdogs while they wander homeless in the streets.

A flag at half mast to communicate national mourning.

I sat down today, the Sunday before Memorial Day, and I had no idea what to write about. I’d written a post ten years ago that pretty well expressed what I felt then, and the only change I would make now would be to remove all mention of….hell…I won’t mention them here. The small town I wrote about that never recovered from the fighting of WWII….their population is (surprisingly) up in the last ten years, but still significantly less than pre WWII levels. Some wounds never heal.

So I sat and pondered, thinking about those who died that we might live free. About the veterans who live homeless, or commit suicide because our society doesn’t care about them. I wanted a snappy title, something that would catch the reader. So I looked up the 100 most googled questions in the US. I was almost ready to move on to another idea when I came across query 99. “Why is the flag at half mast?”

https://www.semrush.com/blog/most-searched-keywords-google/#the-top-100-most-googled-questions-in-the-us

In this particular case, I believe it likely was because of the mass shooting, specifically the one at Uvalde. You can actually take your pick of tragedies, there were eight mass shootings in the US since Tuesday. (Editorial note: the figures climbed almost exponentially as I wrote this post. I’m leaving the figure unchanged to make a point…you can’t even get a fricken blog post about mass shootings finished before there are literally 20 more.) I see the working definition is at least four people not counting the shooter maintain injuries or die from a gunshot. One of these was in my proud red state of Oklahoma, the municipality of Taft was afflicted by a 26 year old who allegedly fired into a crowded Memorial Day festival, leaving a 39 year old woman dead, and seven other victims suffering non-life threatening injuries.

Totally off topic, this woman is absolutely not the shooting victim, no this is Lelia Foley-Davis elected mayor of Taft in 1973, she was the very first African American female mayor in US history. The more you know right? image from https://www.okhistory.org/publications/enc/entry.php?entry=FO001

Memorial Day is (well, was before it became a big party day) the day when you remember those who have passed. Especially and specifically those who served in the military (though in my family it was to remember the family that had passed on). And God knows we lost a lot of people in the last week.

I’m going to make three observations on the topic of half mast flags.

  1. The flag has been at half mast in these recent years more than any time in my memory.
  2. Mass killings, which I barely remember happening before the Columbine tragedy, have become so common it is hard to not be numb to the pain.
  3. The apparent Second Amendment/gun control arguments are a red herring of the most despicable order.

I was taught that Memorial Day started with the dedication of the Gettysburg Civil War Cemetery. Evidently I was wrong, or perhaps it just is no longer taught. The dedication was in November, not May, and the practice of decorating and tending graves on a day in May would not “go viral” for a few years yet. I took this photo from my old blog post, I don’t remember where I’d gotten it then.

Some years ago I noticed the flag was at half mast a lot. There seemed to be a steady stream of mass shootings, important government people passing away, and in the end, there was Covid, a failed coup, and all kinds of horrible things going on that often merited a flag lowered in grief.

According to Mercury News, the flag flew at half mast somewhere in the US (it can vary by state) 328 days during the year 2015. Biden ordered the flag flown at half mast (so this figure doesn’t include the various states) for 92 days in 2021. I find innumerable articles talking about Trump ordering flags to fly at half mast (most of them condemnatory), but I have failed to find any stats. I have found stats for the three previous President’s citing slate.com, who in turn cites USA Today:

USA Today reported recently that that’s a record: Obama has ordered flags at half-staff more than any other president in United States history; more than George W. Bush’s 58 orders and Bill Clinton’s 50. All told, the flag has been perched halfway down the pole for 162 days of Obama’s administration.”

https://www.mercurynews.com/2016/07/01/u-s-flag-at-half-staff-328-days-last-year-is-the-tribute-overused/#:~:text=NewsNational%20News-,U.S.%20flag%20at%20half%2Dstaff%20328%20days,year%3A%20Is%20the%20tribute%20overused%3F

https://slate.com/culture/2016/07/obama-has-ordered-flags-to-half-staff-more-than-any-other-president-why.html

“And I think to myself…..what a wonderful….” blam! Image from Joblo.com.

Mercury News asks the question j the gesture is being overused. Your Tired Blogger (What Blogged at Midnight) asks….is this just another example that our world is falling apart?

My second point dovetails with the first point. Frankly, if we are suffering more mass shootings than ever before, it only makes sense that the flag would fly low more often than before.

One of the earliest photos of war ever, a daguerreotype of the burial site for Lt. Col Henry Clay, 1847, during the Mexican War.

I looked up the number of school shootings before the 1990s, and the first thing to pop up was Wikipedia. One reader has voiced concern about the reliability of that site, so I looked up on Activebeat.com, and several useful articles popped up, but I found nothing telling me what happened before 1994. So back to “ol’ reliable” I go. The figures I am about to share are not “mass shootings,” just any shooting at all either on campus, or on a school bus.

In the 1840’s there was, in the US, one incident “John Anthony Gardner Davis, a law professor at the University of Virginia, was shot by student Joseph Semmes and died three days later. In the 1850s there were three. In the 1860s (Wiki excludes “war incidents” so this may be incomplete, as the first half of the decade is dominated by the Civil War) there were five. In the 1870s there were seven. The 1880s saw ten, the gay 90s saw only six. The first decade of the 20th century broke an average of one or more per year; there were 13 shootings in a US school. Finally there is a decade that matches….last week…..(Editorial note: once again, I wrote too slow. From the time I wrote this till the time I pushed the “publish” button there were seven more mass shootings).

The roaring 20s with their much touted violence saw a decline back down to ten shootings (again, let me reiterate, we are not talking mass shootings….just any shooting that in some way involved a student either as the shooter or the victim on school grounds or on a school bus). The 30’s saw a further decline to seven. The 40s saw 8, the 50s must have seemed like an explosion of violence, since the numbers more than doubled to 19.

The iconic movie Rebel Without a Cause (that I could actually never get through for some reason) painted the picture of fear in the minds of the 50s citizen. Looking at the figures I can’t blame them, the school shootings had more than doubled, and there were more school shooting in this decade than in all of US history before 1880. It must have seemed a sign of the end times. Last week we had 18 fatalities in one school shooting. In all of the 50s there were only thirteen fatalities (people had bad aim in the 50s I guess). The image is from TIME.com.

I feel a bit pedantic, but I also feel a dark awe at the sheer meat grinder life has become. Let’s see….everyone says America went to hell in the 60s when prayer was taken out of schools and drugs and hippies took over the scene. What were their numbers like? 21 school shootings in the US. So worse than the 50s, but only slightly so….how about fatalities? The numbers are pretty sobering here……40….the fatalities exploded from thirteen to forty. 18 of these fatalities happened on August 1, 1966, at Austin Texas. My Dad used to tell me about that one. The guy climbed the University of Texas tower, and started firing. He made it 96 minutes until police brought in a sniper who could finally get at him at the right angle and take him down.

Charles Whitman was the worst face of evil before Columbine. If you were talking school killing in Oklahoma or Texas in my childhood, this was the man you were likely talking about. Photo from Wikipedia.

We get to my lifetime, now the numbers should get crazy. The 70s me generation with their drugs and angry Vietnam vets saw forty school shootings (one of which was in OKC) with 39 deaths. So the much touted violence of the seventies doesn’t seem to be much different than the sixties. But the 80s….that’s where it will go nuts! Reagan messed up everything, there was all this violence in the movies and tv, and all that cocaine and the introduction of crack…surely the 80s were a blood bath.

Here we have a historically accurate magazine cover depicting Ronald Reagan with his Secretary of Defense planning their Latin American strategies. I hope it is ok to admit, I actually love the first Rambo movie. And much of my life is summed up with a quote from the second movie, “Sir, do we get to win this time”? Mad Magazine cover image taken from madtrash.com

Well….the 80s is in fact where things get out of hand. We go from forty to sixty incidents, and the fatalities sixty seven. I remember how horrible we thought things were, and from pulpits and “prophets” there were warnings. “Repent or it will get worse.” I wish I could say they were wrong.

The nineties was the decade ol’ Bill Clinton taught us to be peaceful, loving people. How well did his message take? In the nineties there were 92 incidents. So in raw numbers of events, we have two decades with roughly 50 percent increases in events. The fatalities in the nineties roughly double, to (if my math is correct) 119. 15 from Columbine alone. Remember though, as bad as Columbine was, even at that time, it was not the record for school mass shootings. As a nation we had finally arrived.

I was a huge fan of Michael Moore in the 90s with his witty and informative TV Nation. As I became more and more conservative, my enthusiasm for him chilled. I honestly never watched this movie. I remember Rush Limbaugh saying less than positive things about the movie. Since then I have watched Planet of the Humans, and found I loved it. Maybe I am a liberal wacko after all…..image from Rotten Tomatoes. Bloggers sense of humor from Attack of the Killer Tomatoes.

The 2000s were the new millennium, the Age of Aquarius was upon us. We survived Y2K, we agonized over 9/11 and sold our liberties for security that never came. It became hard to think about school shootings when terrorists were killing thousands of people and we were threatened with WMD’s in the Middle East. I was a new husband and father, trying desperately to figure out how all that worked. I barely had time to listen to anything at all. Usually I was the last to know.

In the 2000s there were 68 incidents, so very roughly there was a 25% drop in incidents, while fatalities….they exploded. The bad guy’s aim got significantly better. If my math is right there were 105 fatalities this decade, a whopping 33 (and there we have the dark side of the Pareto Efficiency) from the Virginia Tech shooting in April 16, 2007. The story just kept getting better.

Sadly, I’d actually forgotten this hellish event. It was the record breaker at the time. I did a bit of research, since I remembered so little. The police were criticized back then for the “long” response time. The controversy was because it took five minutes to break down the door. “You don’t have time to wait,” said Aaron Cohen, president of IMS Security of Los Angeles, who has trained SWAT teams around the country since 2003. “You don’t have time to preplan a response. Even if you have a few guys, you go.”
Cohen said a trained SWAT team should have been able to get inside a locked building in less than a minute. But the police had no time to wait for the SWAT team. http://archive.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/26/police_response_timeline_at_virginia_tech_examined/

People talk as though only the United States has this problem. I almost wish that were true. Here we have images of the worst school shooting of all time. The Beslan School Siege was an event that happened during the Second Chechen War. Terrorists took the entire school hostage. During a three day siege 1100 people, including 777 children, were held by Riyad-us Saliheen. After this even, massive powers were consolidated into Vladimir Putin’s hands. The “Tree of Sorrows” was a statue built over the cemetery for the victims, of whom there were 333, of whom 186 were children. 31 of the terrorists lost their lives in this horrific act. More people died in these three days in Chechnya than have died in the US since 2010 from school shootings.

Finally….we get up to date….since 2010 there have been….are you sitting down….? 254 school shootings. So the rough number of incidents quadrupled since 2010. Granted, we have two more years to factor in, still….and as for fatalities…..if I’m doing my math right there have been 247 deaths associated with school shootings since 2010. So very roughly, we have 2.35 times as many deaths.

There are then, very demonstrably, more school shooting than any time in the past. Numbers aren’t everything, but they also don’t lie.

Reports seem to vary, but Uvalde police waited at least 45 minutes to engage the shooter. Remember, the Virginia Tech police were criticized (I believe unfairly) for taking five minutes to open a door. I know I touched a nerve with one of my friends when I shared a FB post critical of the police action in Uvalde. And I get it…I’m not in the line of fire, I don’t know all the details, I’m an armchair quarterback running his mouth. But you see images like this, and know in your heart a shooter is murdering children. I don’t mean to be critical of these officers, from what I gather they were given bad orders and false information. But it is still galling. My first reaction was I might do the same. Then I thought “what if my son were there?” And I realized that if I had skin in the game, no f—— rule book or politics or cyoa is going to stop me from trying to stop the shooter. Likely I would die, but nothing but a bullet would stop me. I’m just saying. Image from People.com

I’ve written 2532 words on this topic, and still have not covered my third point. I’ll cover it in my next post. Comments are more than welcome. I will hopefully have the second post published tomorrow. Oh and….since I started writing this particular post, there have been 20 more mass (not necessarily school shootings), one of which is in my own home of Tulsa. A mass hospital shooting, no less.